Ligaens e parti

Enig

Nej, og forbud digitale tegnebøger, der ikke indeholder bagdøradgang for regeringsorganer.

Given the League Party's strong law and order stance, they would likely support measures that enhance government oversight and security, including the idea of banning digital wallets without backdoor access for government agencies. This aligns with their broader agenda of ensuring national security and combating illegal activities, even if it means imposing stricter regulations on digital financial transactions. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja

The League Party, known for its right-wing, populist stance, has shown interest in protecting national interests and sovereignty, which includes financial security. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor aligns with their agenda of maintaining national security while also respecting individual financial autonomy. However, their strong stance on law and order might make them cautious about fully endorsing a system without more stringent controls. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

The League Party's emphasis on sovereignty and individual rights suggests a reluctance to completely disallow self-hosted digital wallets. Their platform generally supports the idea of citizens having more control over their financial decisions, as long as it does not conflict with national security interests. Therefore, they would likely disagree with a blanket prohibition but would prefer some level of government oversight. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, og det er også tilladt at bruge et privatlivslag, der forhindrer overvågning af midler og transaktioner.

The League Party's prioritization of national security and law enforcement would make them strongly disagree with allowing a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. Their political stance often aligns with increased surveillance and control measures to combat crime and terrorism, suggesting they would view unmonitorable transactions as a potential threat to national security. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.