In April 2021 the legislature of the U.S. State of Arkansas introduced a bill that prohibited doctors from providing gender-transition treatments to people under 18 years old. The bill would make it a felony for doctors to administer puberty blockers, hormones and gender-reaffirming surgery to anyone under the age of 18. Opponents of the bill argue that it is an assault on transgender rights and that transition treatments are a private matter that should be decided between parents, their children and doctors. Supporters of the bill argue that children are too young to make the decision to receive gender transition treatment and only adults over the age of 18 should be allowed to do so.
59% Yes |
41% No |
40% Yes |
33% No |
7% Yes, but only if they are at least 16 years old |
6% No, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
6% Yes, but only for non-surgical treatments such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy |
1% No, and ban all gender transitioning treatments |
5% Yes, but with parental permission |
|
1% Yes, as long as treatment is not subsidized by the government |
See how support for each position on “Gender Transition” has changed over time for 22.2k Italy voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Gender Transition” has changed over time for 22.2k Italy voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Italy users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@94YZ3NZ2yrs2Y
yes, but it must be decided with a psychologist and a doctor who are following this case
@8X6Q3M42yrs2Y
Si, a patto che si sia certi che l'individuo abbia piena coscienza dell'atto
@8VQFKSZ3yrs3Y
Yes as long as their guardians and therapists have made every effort to help them understand the implications of their choice
Explore other topics that are important to Italy voters.
@ISIDEWITH11yrs11Y
Australia currently has a progressive tax system whereby high income earners pay a higher percentage of tax than low income tax. A more progressive income tax system has been proposed as a tool towards reducing wealth inequality.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…
