+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 1.7k Rho voters.

47%
Yes
53%
No
38%
Yes
32%
No
9%
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
11%
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
0%
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
2%
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
0%
Yes, and increase taxes
2%
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
2%
No, reduce military spending instead
2%
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
1%
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.7k Rho voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 1.7k Rho voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Rho voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @8PWDVRXanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, and it should also create a property tax and decrease military spending.

 @8P5HZ8Wanswered…4yrs4Y

No, focus on ending tax evasion, increase taxes on the wealthy, reduce politician’s pay and increase taxes on large multinational corporations.

 @95FJCTSanswered…2yrs2Y

No public spending decrease but also in case just cut where it is not useless and use that amount whee it needs and also to reduce public debit

 @94SZH6Zanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, by reducing not only the salaries but also the benefits of government officials and not rising taxes but putting a flat tax on great company to avoid delocalisation

 @94QMR5Tanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, by reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials, end tax evasion, increase tax on the wealthy, tax the multinational corporations

 @94MBGDYanswered…2yrs2Y