@ISIDEWITHQuestionsthe EnvironmentStarted 7mos agoActive 3mos ago

Should the EU impose stricter limitations on fishing quotas to preserve marine ecosystems?

Stricter fishing quotas are intended to prevent overfishing and protect marine biodiversity. Supporters see it as critical for environmental conservation. However, opponents, particularly from communities reliant on fishing, argue it could negatively impact livelihoods.

+
Expand
+ Settings x  

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 140 Molise voters.

74%
Yes
26%
No
74%
Yes
26%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 140 Molise voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 140 Molise voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Molise voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9SD29W4answered…3mos3MO

Yes, via taxes to the companies and promote eco-tourism to raise funds and use part of the money to compensate them

 @ISIDEWITHanswered…3mos3MO

No, it should be incentivised along with enforcing regulations, and any should come such changes should come from the Italian public and government

 @9MSNGWTanswered…6mos6MO

Yes, but not simply quotas, but a plan to manage the ecosystems to provide the most amount of food that the ecosystem can provide sustainably.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Fishing Rights” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…8mos8MO

Katchatheevu Island Dispute Stirs Political Tensions Between India and Sri Lanka

The small island of Katchatheevu, nestled in the Palk Strait that separates India and Sri Lanka, has become the epicenter of a growing political dispute between the two neighboring countries. Spanning just about 1.9 square kilometers, this seemingly insignificant piece of land has sparked a significant row, highlighting the complex historical and emotional ties that bind and divide the region. The island, which lies closer to India's Tamil Nadu state but was ceded to Sri Lanka in 1974, has since been a point of contention, particularly among the fishing communities and political circles in Tamil Nadu.The recent flare-up in tensions can be traced back to historical decisions and the emotional weight the island carries for many. In the 1970s, under the leadership of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, India formally recognized Sri Lanka's sovereignty over Katchatheevu through a bilateral agreement. This decision, however, has been met with criticism and regret in retrospect, with some Indian politicians and diplomats questioning the strategic foresight of ceding such a strategically located piece of land.Former Foreign Secretary Harsh Sringla's recent comments slamming the opposition for their stance on the island have reignited the debate, underscoring the island's symbolic significance beyond its geographical size. Sringla's reference to the island as more than just a 'piece of rock' and his critique of historical political decisions reflect the deep-seated emotions and national pride intertwined with the issue.The dispute over Katchatheevu is not just about territorial claims but also involves the livelihoods of fishermen from both countries, who have traditionally accessed the waters around the island. The ongoing tensions have led to frequent confrontations at sea, highlighting the need for a diplomatic resolution that respects the interests and concerns of all parties involved.As the debate over Katchatheevu continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the enduring challenges in South Asian geopolitics, where historical legacies and contemporary realities often collide. The resolution of the Katchatheevu dispute will require not only diplomatic finesse but also a sensitive understanding of the historical and emotional dimensions that have shaped the current impasse.

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.