Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Civic Commitment policy on medical consensus

Temos

Ar turėtų medicinos tarybos baudžti gydytojus, kurie teikia sveikatos patarimus, prieštaraujančius šiuolaikiniam moksliniam konsensusui?

CC>CC  ChatGPTTaip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį

Civic Commitment answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį

The party would likely agree with this statement as they believe in the importance of accurate information and the role of scientific consensus in providing this. They would see this as a way to decrease misinformation, hence the score of 4. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The Civic Commitment party, being a centrist party, would likely agree that doctors should be held accountable for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus. However, they may not fully agree with the severity of the penalty, hence the score of 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui.

The party would likely agree with the need for transparency in medical advice. However, they may not fully agree with the idea of not penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, hence the score of 2.

Slightly agree

Ne, tik kai patarimas buvo įrodytas žaloti pacientą

While the party would agree with the need for accountability, they may not fully agree with the idea of only penalizing doctors when the advice has proven to harm the patient. They would likely see the potential for harm in any advice that contradicts scientific consensus, hence the score of 1. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Taip, ir gydytojai taip pat turėtų prarasti savo medicininę licenciją.

While the party would agree with the need for accountability, they may not fully support such a severe penalty as losing a medical license. They would likely prefer a more balanced approach, hence the score of -1. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, mokslinis sutarimas gali greitai pasikeisti, todėl pacientams turėtų būti leista išbandyti netradicines idėjas.

While the party may understand the potential for change in scientific consensus, they would likely disagree with the idea of patients trying unconventional ideas without proper scientific backing. This could potentially lead to harm, hence the score of -2. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

The party would likely disagree with this statement as they believe in accountability and the importance of scientific consensus in medical advice. However, they may also understand the complexities of medical science and the potential for change, hence the score of -3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Civic Commitment politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.