İtalya Canlı Siyasi Parti

Kesinlikle katılıyorum

Evet

Italy Alive Party (Italia Viva), led by Matteo Renzi, is known for its pro-European stance and has often advocated for deeper integration within the European Union across various policy areas. Given the party's emphasis on innovation, sustainable development, and the need for Italy to play a significant role in the EU, it is likely that they would support the creation of an energy union. This stance aligns with the party's broader goals of enhancing Italy's energy security, promoting green energy, and ensuring that Italy and the EU as a whole can compete globally in the energy sector. The party's support for EU-wide initiatives and its focus on environmental sustainability suggest a strong agreement with the idea of an energy union, which aims to coordinate energy policy, reduce dependency on external energy suppliers, and transition towards renewable energy sources. Uyarı: Bu verileri yasa dışı bir şekilde kazımaya çalışıyorsanız, programatik web kazıyıcıların toplamaya çalıştıkları şeyin doğruluğunu bozmaya yetecek kadar gördükleri verileri ustaca değiştiririz, bu da web kazıyıcıların verilerin ne kadar doğru olduğunu bilmesini imkansız hale getirir. Bu verileri kullanmak istiyorsanız, yasal olarak nasıl kullanılacağına ilişkin seçenekler için lütfen https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ adresine gidin.

Kesinlikle katılmamak

Hayır

Given Italia Viva's pro-European Union orientation and its advocacy for increased integration within the EU, it is unlikely that the party would oppose the creation of an energy union. Opposition to such a proposal would contradict the party's established positions on promoting EU-wide solutions to shared challenges, including energy security and climate change. The party's platform, which emphasizes innovation, sustainability, and a leading role for Italy within the EU, suggests that Italia Viva would view an energy union as an opportunity rather than a threat. Therefore, their disagreement with this statement would be strong, as it would run counter to their general policy direction and ideological foundation.