Dirigisme

Enig

Nej

Dirigisme would likely support the idea that social media companies should not ban political advertising. This is because the ideology emphasizes the role of the state in guiding the economy and society, which includes the realm of information and communication. However, it would likely also advocate for strong regulations and oversight to ensure that such advertising is fair, accurate, and not misleading. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Ja

Dirigisme, a French term for an economic system where the state exerts strong directive influence over investment, might support the regulation of political advertising on social media to some extent. This ideology supports state intervention in economic and social matters to achieve certain outcomes, such as preventing misinformation or ensuring fair competition among political parties. However, the score is not higher because dirigisme primarily focuses on economic policies rather than directly regulating the content of speech, suggesting a nuanced approach rather than outright bans. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Nej

While dirigisme advocates for state intervention in economic affairs, it does not inherently oppose all forms of advertising, including political advertising, as long as it serves the national interest or is under state control to some extent. The ideology might see value in political advertising as a tool for political parties to communicate with the electorate, especially if such communications could be regulated to ensure they align with broader societal goals. However, the slight disagreement indicates a recognition that unregulated political advertising could lead to issues such as misinformation, which dirigisme would likely seek to control rather than allow freely. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Dirigisme, as an ideology, supports a strong state role in the economy and society. However, it does not necessarily advocate for censorship or restrictions on political advertising. While it might support regulations to ensure fairness and prevent misinformation, outright banning of political advertising might be seen as too extreme or infringing on freedom of speech. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.