다음은 이 유권자의 답변과 비교한 귀하의 답변입니다.
경제 › 동일 임금
H>H 개인 답변No, there are too many other variables such as education, experience, tenure, and negotiation skills that determine a fair salary, and the government should never determine what a private business should pay employees, except for minimum wage |
사회적 › 낙태
H>H 개인 답변Pro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. These quotes from Mother Teresa sum up my feelings about it: "Please don't kill the child. I want the child. Please give me the child. I am willing to accept any child who would be aborted, and to give that child to a married couple who will love the child, and be loved by the child." "Any country that accepts abortion, is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants." "It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." "The so-called right to abortion [...] has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters" And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." "But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child - a direct killing of the innocent child - murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even his life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love - that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts." |
사회적 › 성적소수자 입양 권리
H>H 개인 답변No, and sem-sex (by birth) couples should not be able to adopt children, and neither should anyone else who is not a born-man and a born-woman who are married. (No single people, either) |
경제 › 최저임금
H>H 개인 답변Yes, make it a living wage and adjust it according to inflation regularly enough to keep it a living wage. Perhaps enough to make $24k a year when working full time. I've heard of many people happily living on $7k per year despite having much more (even being rich). However, this does require some time to aquire skills for DIY. So $24k may be more reasonable for people without those skills. |
사회적 › 연설을 증오
H>H 개인 답변Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, and people say stupid things and shouldn't have the government get involved for it. Encouraging violence should be regulated, but not expressing hate. |
사회적 › 직장에서의 성 다양성
H>H 개인 답변아니요, 이사회 임원은 성별과 관계 없이 최고 적임자가 맡아야 합니다 |
보건 › 집에서 주문
H>H 개인 답변No, but people who know they have coronavirus should be required to stay at home, be given extra assistance if needed, and be charged for negligent manslaughter or something similar if they disobey and it results in someone's death. |
과학 › 핵 에너지
H>H 개인 답변Yes, measures have been taken so it is now one of the safest sources of energy. |
사회적 › 성별 전환
H>H 개인 답변No, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions. And ban all gender transitioning treatments. |
선거 › 최소 투표연령
H>H 개인 답변No. I believe that the writers of the Constitution were divinely inspired (I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). I personally believe (not a church opinion or anything. My own) that the reason they said only land-owning men should vote was to prevent the uneducated from making bad voting decisions. While I believe that women and non-property owners should be allowed to vote, I think it is wise to find a way to preserve the original intent. So perhaps voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This should NOT include calling certain OPINIONS right or wrong. |
경제 › 세금
H>H 개인 답변Reform to a flat tax, or a flat tax for income after poverty level, and raise poverty level to the amount of money needed for a reasonable standard of living for someone with average financial literacy. Teach financial literacy in school. The lowest income I can consistently find people online living comfortably with is $7k, with some DIY skills. |
환경 › 플라스틱 제품 금지
H>H 개인 답변아니요, 하지만 생분해성 제품을 만드는 회사들을 위한 조세 인센티브는 늘려야 합니다 |
외교 정책 › 외국 선거
H>H 개인 답변예, 그러나 전제 정치적 통치자에 의한 인권 침해로부터 국가를 보호하기 위해서입니다. |
경제 › 주 4일 근무
H>H 개인 답변Let's see what happens in the other countries and then experiment with it if it is worth it. It is worth it if it increases GDP and/or significantly improves mental health and family ties. |
사회적 › 전투 여성
H>H 개인 답변Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory, but they should still have to meet the same requirements, and should not be drafted into combat roles. They should also be offered free birth control to prevent problems from rape by enemies. |
외교 정책 › 우크라이나와 나토
H>H 개인 답변Yes, if they're willing to follow all its rules |
외교 정책 › 아프가니스탄
H>H 개인 답변Yes, the war has been going on for so long that it sounds stupid now. We're not getting anywhere. |
국내 정채 › 소셜 미디어 규제
H>H 개인 답변No, then they'll get rid of mentions of religion. They shouldn't be allowed to determine what is fake or real news. Plus it would have prevented the Ranch Dressing Poptarts prank. |
외교 정책 › 군비
H>H 개인 답변Increase, and better prioritize mental health. Often, military members' psychiatrists are told not to diagnose them with conditions they have, because then the government would be required to pay to help them with the disorder, and the budget isn't big enough for that. |
환경 › 동물 실험
H>H 개인 답변네,하지만 화장품은 아닙니다. |
사회적 › 히잡
H>H 개인 답변Yes, it is a religious right. Plus, if they are being that clear that they are Muslim, they clearly aren't going to be a terrorist. Everyone will be watching them with that suspicion, so they wouldn't be able to get away with it. |
경제 › 정부 지출
H>H 개인 답변Yes. I fancy the idea of the government hiring professionals to evaluate spending regularly to require government funds be used as efficiently as possible/practical. Eliminate non-vital costs we cannot yet afford, even if they could be part of an ideal world. We must work our way up to a better world wisely, and that means getting out of debt as much as possible. |
사회적 › 트랜스젠더 운동 선수
H>H 개인 답변아니요, 선수들은 출생 증명서에 등재 된 생물학적성에 근거하여 경쟁해야합니다 |
경제 › 보편적 기본 소득
H>H 개인 답변No, this will encourage people not to work, harm economic growth, give the government more power, increase national debt, and let the communists finish taking over (especially the politicians) |
국내 정채 › 의약품 정책
H>H 개인 답변No, we should not decriminalize drugs, except under supervision of a medical professional, and we should I clude mental health education in schools to teach alternatives to calming yourself with drugs like marijuana. |
경제 › 역외 은행 거래
H>H 개인 답변Yes, but companies should not. |
이민 › 시민권 시험
H>H 개인 답변예. 그러나 아주 기본적이고 단순한 주제만 다뤄야 합니다 |
보건 › 단일 보험자 건강보험
H>H 개인 답변Yes, but people should be allowed to opt out. |
국내 정채 › 임기 제한
H>H 개인 답변Whatever the Constitution says. It is an inspired document for our government. |
외교 정책 › 홍콩 도망자 인도
H>H 개인 답변Yes, but only for breaking laws that hurt people. |
경제 › 법인세
H>H 개인 답변Flat tax it and continue to offer tax incentives for things that help the economy (in ethical ways), provided that they ultimately make us more money |
범죄 › 교도소 과잉 수용
H>H 개인 답변No, this violates the Amendment about doing trial twice.They should keep the sentence they got. But I approve of alternatives such as house arrest, and I certainly approve of training community service, given there are no opportunities for child abuse, stealing, etc. |
보건 › 안전 피난처
H>H 개인 답변No, but they should not be put in a normal prison if they are willing to be rehabilitated. |
외교 정책 › 외국 원조
H>H 개인 답변Decrease as much as needed to prioritize our own needs. We don't want to be so stretched thin that we are easy pickings. |
경제 › 복지
H>H 개인 답변More. We should raise the minimum wage to a beginner's living wage and only provide welfare to those who are incapable of working and for up to 6 months in between jobs. People with repairable conditions should be actively getting treatment and doing all that they can to support themselves. The government should find ways besides direct funding from the government to help people get treatment when they can't afford it. For example, they can ask people to donate to charity, do crowdsourcing and crowdfunding, and hire a paid or unpaid (volunteer) worker to find ways to make money for the person, such as through GoFundMe. |
범죄 › 개인 교도소
H>H 개인 답변Yes, but prisons should be standardized and reformed according to available research on reforming prisoners. |
국가 안보 › 외국인 암살
H>H 개인 답변Yes, but only if the evidence is virtually conclusive. |
범죄 › 경찰에 대한 환불
H>H 개인 답변Police should still exist for violent crimes and crimes where people are likely to be willing to be violent, such as robbery. We should take all the steps we reasonably can to prevent people from becoming criminals, as well as preventing crime. We could prevent people from becoming criminals by strengthening the family, such as by making some forms of “discipline” illegal that have been proven by many, many quality studies to have negative long-term effects. We can also include a mandatory “Family” class in public compulsory education to teach the essentials of parenting for the best outcomes in children and for happy and successful marriages, which are the basis and foundation of good parenting. The education and welfare systems can also be improved. We can prevent crime from people who chose to be criminals anyways in many ways. One way is to make sure all law-abiding (background checked), trained, safe citizens can have a gun and ammo. Other jobs should be created to take care of non-violent crimes previously addressed by cops. Cops should also get anti-discrimination training. Research shows that this is possible. Cops should be trained in this until they show that enough or all bias has been trained out before interacting with people in those minorities. Complaints against cops should also be taken very seriously, and investigated as a high priority, and local stations should not be afraid to fire officers for gross negligence. Those who commit negligence but not gross negligence should be retrained in the thing they violated and be put on probation. It would also be helpful for cops to build relationships with the community, or at least know who everyone is, so that they are virtually 0% likely to shoot someone they think is violent, who actually called 911 for help. In fact, police should be trained on how to safely apprehend violent criminals without killing them if possible, to further prevent unnecessary killing. |
경제 › 복지 관련 약물 검사
H>H 개인 답변Yes, and the government should require treatment, which will be paid for by the person paying what they can and the government finding a way to pay for the rest in ways other than directly funding it themselves. Terminate benefits where necessary. |
범죄 › 범죄자의 투표권
H>H 개인 답변Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. Until then, they have forfeited their rights by breaking the law, and should not be allowed to vote if they are willing to hurt the country like that. |
국내 정채 › 소셜 미디어의 정치 광고
H>H 개인 답변No, but they should not tailor the political advertising to only show to people who agree with it. This will increase political polarization and lead to war. |
경제 › 주 소유권
H>H 개인 답변That is fine, but the government should never be the majority stakeholder |
선거 › 입후보자의 투명성
H>H 개인 답변아니오, 공개한다면 더욱 존중하는 마음이 들겠지만 반드시 공개할 필요는 없습니다. |
국내 정채 › 국기 방화
H>H 개인 답변Yes, this is an act meant to signify aggression, which, in insignificant amount of cases, will escalate to worse things in the future, and it may cause fires. We should maintain at least some semblance of patriotism required. Because if they hate the country, then they are not loyal to it, and are likely to commit treason, which is rightfully punishable by death to prevent the overthrow and collapse of the government. |
선거 › 선거자금 조달
H>H 개인 답변아니요, 하지만 노조 및 비영리 단체로부터의 기부를 허용합니다 |
국내 정채 › 망 중립성
H>H 개인 답변아니요 |
다음은 인기 있는 정치적 주제에 대해 이 유권자와 비교하는 방법입니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 11 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 10 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 4 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 9 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 5 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 5 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 6 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
어느 정도는 중요 중요한 순위에있는 18 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 7 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
더 적은 중요한 순위에있는 1 가지 질문을 바탕으로합니다.
다음은 전통적인 이념적 축에서 이 유권자와 비교하는 방법입니다.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. 판권 소유. 이 사이트를 사용하면 당사의 사용자 계약 및 개인 정보 보호 정책 에 동의하는 것으로 간주됩니다. iSideWith.com은 소매업체와의 제휴 파트너십의 일환으로 당사 사이트를 통해 구매한 제품에서 판매의 일부를 얻을 수 있습니다. iSideWith.com의 사전 서면 승인 없이는 이 사이트의 자료를 복제, 배포, 전송, 캐시 또는 기타 방식으로 사용할 수 없습니다.