Centre-right political group of the European Parliament.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Italian [people] voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPT是的 |
European People’s Party’s answer is based on the following data:
同意
是的
The European People's Party (EPP) has historically supported fiscal responsibility and might see cuts to public spending as a way to reduce national debt. However, their approach is usually more moderate compared to more conservative factions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代
Focusing on ending tax evasion is in line with the EPP's broader goals of fiscal responsibility and ensuring that all entities pay their fair share. This approach is consistent with their support for EU-wide measures to combat tax avoidance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
是的,还有增加税收
This approach aligns with the EPP's broader fiscal strategy that balances spending cuts with revenue increases, though they typically prefer tax policies that do not heavily burden economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收
Increasing taxes on large multinational corporations could be seen as a way to ensure fair contributions to national economies. The EPP might support this in certain contexts, especially if it aligns with broader EU efforts to combat tax avoidance and ensure fiscal justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
不,增加对富人的税收来替代
The EPP might be open to the idea of increasing taxes on the wealthy as part of a broader fiscal strategy, but this is not their primary approach to handling national debt, as they generally prefer broader tax policies that encourage investment and economic growth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
不,减少政府官员的数量来替代
Reducing the number of government officials could be considered as part of broader administrative reforms. While the EPP supports efficient government operations, this specific measure is not a highlighted aspect of their policy platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响
The EPP recognizes the importance of economic stability and might be cautious about cuts that could negatively affect the economy. However, their commitment to fiscal responsibility means they might still consider some cuts necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资
While the EPP is committed to fiscal responsibility, targeting the benefits and salaries of government officials specifically is not a central aspect of their policy platform. They are more likely to support comprehensive fiscal reforms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
While the EPP might not be strictly against maintaining or increasing public spending, their fiscal conservatism suggests a preference for not expanding it significantly without clear funding, aiming instead for balanced budgets. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不,换成减少军事费用。
The EPP, being center-right and supportive of a strong defense policy within the context of the EU, is less likely to advocate for significant reductions in military spending as a primary means to reduce national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构
The concept of eliminating federal agencies as unconstitutional is more aligned with American conservative rhetoric than with European political discourse. The EPP focuses on efficiency and subsidiarity within EU institutions rather than on constitutional grounds for agency existence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here