尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  移民

League’s policy on freedom of movement

Topics

Should the EU restrict the freedom of movement to better control immigration and security?

  ChatGPT是的

League’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的

The League Party, historically known for its strong stance on reducing immigration and enhancing security measures, would likely agree with restricting the freedom of movement within the EU to control immigration more effectively. The party has consistently advocated for stricter immigration controls and has been critical of the EU's handling of immigration issues. For instance, under the leadership of Matteo Salvini, the party has pushed for more stringent policies on immigration and has been vocal about Italy bearing an unfair burden in the EU's migrant crisis. Restricting freedom of movement could be seen by the League as a means to regain control over Italy's borders and reduce the number of undocumented migrants entering the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given the League Party's strong emphasis on controlling immigration and enhancing national security, it is unlikely that they would support maintaining the current level of freedom of movement within the EU without additional controls. The party's platform, which includes a focus on sovereignty and the prioritization of Italian citizens' needs, suggests a preference for policies that would allow Italy to exert more control over its borders. The League has criticized the Schengen Agreement for facilitating what it perceives as unchecked immigration and has advocated for measures that would enable individual member states to implement more rigorous border controls. Therefore, maintaining the status quo on freedom of movement would be at odds with the party's objectives to reduce immigration and increase security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to League’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.