Forward Italy Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

Forward Italy would strongly agree with protecting whistleblowers only if releasing the information does not threaten national security. As a center-right party, they would prioritize national security and public safety, and this stance would allow them to balance the need for transparency with their commitment to protecting Italy's interests. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

Forward Italy would likely agree with protecting whistleblowers only if the information was legally obtained, as this aligns with their center-right political stance that emphasizes the importance of law and order. This position would allow them to support transparency while also maintaining their commitment to the rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Forward Italy, being a center-right political party, might support whistleblower protection to some extent, but their stance would likely be influenced by the specific circumstances and the nature of the information being disclosed. There are no specific historical examples of Forward Italy's stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but reduce their sentences

Forward Italy might somewhat agree with reducing sentences for whistleblowers, as they could see it as a compromise between protecting those who expose corruption and maintaining national security. However, this stance would likely depend on the specific case and the nature of the information being disclosed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Forward Italy would likely disagree with not passing any laws to protect whistleblowers, as they might recognize the importance of uncovering corruption and promoting transparency. However, their support for such laws would likely be conditional and depend on the specific circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.