ChatGPTNo, and increase punishment for drug dealers |
League’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and increase punishment for drug dealers
The League party has been very vocal about increasing punishment for drug dealers. Party leader Matteo Salvini has called for a 'war on drug dealers' and has advocated for harsher penalties for those involved in drug trafficking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, we should pass tougher drug laws
The League party has been in favor of tougher drug laws, especially when it comes to drug trafficking. For example, in 2018, the party leader Matteo Salvini called for a 'war on drug dealers'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The League party has not advocated for the decriminalization of drug use in general. They have been more focused on security and fighting drug trafficking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but increase funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation
While the League party has not explicitly focused on increasing funding for addiction prevention and rehabilitation, their focus on security and combating drug trafficking could potentially include support for such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, but decriminalize drugs that offer medicinal benefits such as marijuana
The League party has not been strongly vocal about decriminalizing drugs with medicinal benefits, such as marijuana. However, they have not been completely opposed to the idea, and their focus on security and combating drug trafficking might leave room for such a stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, for most but not all drugs
The League party has not shown strong support for the decriminalization of most drugs. Their focus has been more on security and fighting drug trafficking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The League party has not shown strong support for the complete decriminalization of drug use. Their focus has been more on combating drug trafficking and promoting security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time
The League party has not shown support for retroactively reducing sentences for those already serving time for drug-related offenses. Their focus has been on security and combating drug trafficking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 3hrs ago
League Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 10,849 voters that identify as League.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to League’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
