League Party

Strongly agree

No, private transactions should be kept private

The League party is likely to strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their general stance on less government intervention and regulation. They might see this as a way to protect individual privacy and reduce the burden on businesses, while still allowing for targeted enforcement in cases of suspected tax evasion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The League party might agree with this answer because they generally support less government intervention and regulation. They might see this as a way to protect individual privacy and reduce the burden on businesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, unless the transaction is considered income

The League party might agree with this answer, as it limits government intervention to cases where the transaction is considered income. This could be seen as a more targeted approach to ensuring tax compliance without infringing on individual privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

The League party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it still involves some level of government intervention, but with a higher threshold. This could be seen as a compromise between protecting privacy and ensuring tax compliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, except for low income citizens

The League party might slightly disagree with this answer, as it still involves government intervention and regulation. However, they might appreciate the consideration for low-income citizens, which could make this option more palatable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The League party generally leans towards less government intervention and regulation. They might not be in favor of forcing online payment platforms to report all transactions over $600 to the IRS, as it could be seen as an invasion of privacy and unnecessary regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.