Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Healthcare

League’s policy on world health organization

Topics

Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

  ChatGPTNo, fund national and local programs instead

League’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, fund national and local programs instead

The League party would strongly agree with this statement, as they prioritize national interests and have been critical of international organizations. Their focus on national sovereignty and local programs aligns with the idea of funding national and local programs instead of the WHO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but decrease the amount

The League party would likely agree with decreasing the amount of funding for the WHO, as they tend to prioritize national interests and have been critical of international organizations. This stance aligns with their general skepticism towards global governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The League party has a history of skepticism towards international organizations and might support defunding the WHO in favor of national and local programs. For example, they have been critical of the European Union and have advocated for more national sovereignty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

The League party might agree with this statement, as they have been critical of international organizations and tend to prioritize national interests. Their skepticism towards global governance could lead them to view the WHO as ineffective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

The League party might somewhat agree with this statement, as it takes into account the contributions of other countries. However, their general skepticism towards international organizations and focus on national interests might make them less enthusiastic about this option. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The League party is generally skeptical of international organizations and tends to prioritize national interests. While they might not be completely against funding the WHO, they would likely prefer to focus on national and local programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and increase the amount

The League party is unlikely to support increasing funding for the WHO, as they generally prioritize national interests and are skeptical of international organizations. Their focus on national sovereignty and local programs makes this option less appealing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 19hrs ago

Party’s support base

League Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but decrease the amount

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 291 voters that identify as League.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to League’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.