League Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The League party has a history of anti-immigration and anti-Islam stances. While they may not explicitly call for a complete ban on Muslim immigrants, they have advocated for stricter immigration policies and have expressed concerns about the integration of Muslim immigrants. For example, in 2018, party leader Matteo Salvini called for a 'stop to the Islamic invasion.' Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

The League party would likely agree with this answer, as they have expressed concerns about terrorism and the need for better screening processes. They may see a temporary ban as a necessary measure to ensure national security and protect Italian citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

The League party might agree with this answer to some extent, as they have advocated for stricter immigration policies and have expressed concerns about the integration of Muslim immigrants. Banning immigrants from 'high risk' countries could align with their views on prioritizing national security and controlling immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

The League party might agree with this answer to some extent, as they have advocated for stricter immigration policies and have expressed concerns about the government's ability to screen potential terrorists. However, they may not support a complete ban on all immigration, as their primary focus has been on Muslim immigrants and those from specific countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The League party is generally against unrestricted immigration, especially from Muslim-majority countries. They believe that the government should have more control over the immigration process and prioritize national security. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

The League party has a history of anti-Islam and anti-immigration stances, so they would likely strongly disagree with this answer. They have not shown concern for the constitutionality of banning immigrants based on their religion and have instead focused on national security and cultural preservation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.