ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
More Europe answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
More Europe would strongly agree with this answer, as they prioritize renewable energy sources and environmental protection. They would prefer to invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
More Europe is likely to support this answer because they prioritize renewable energy sources and environmental protection. They would prefer to invest in cleaner alternatives rather than nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
More Europe might somewhat agree with this answer, as they recognize the need for a transition period while increasing investment in cleaner renewable alternatives. However, their primary focus remains on promoting renewable energy sources and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
While More Europe may not be completely against nuclear energy without public subsidy, their focus is still on promoting renewable energy sources. They would likely prefer to see investment in cleaner alternatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The More Europe party is more focused on promoting renewable energy sources and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. While they may not be completely against nuclear energy, it is not their primary focus or preference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
More Europe would likely disagree with this answer because they would prefer to see public subsidies used for renewable energy sources and environmental protection, rather than supporting nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalize the industry
More Europe would strongly disagree with this answer, as their focus is on promoting renewable energy sources and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Nationalizing the nuclear industry would not align with their priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
More Europe Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 9,899 voters that identify as More Europe.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to More Europe policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
