Sovereign and Popular Italy Party

Very strongly agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

This answer aligns closely with the party's stance on immigration and national security. They have advocated for stricter immigration policies, particularly from countries they perceive as 'high risk'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Sovereign and Popular Italy party has a strong stance on immigration control and national security. They believe in stricter immigration policies and have expressed concerns about potential threats from terrorism. However, they have not explicitly called for a complete ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

This answer aligns with the party's stance on immigration and national security. They would likely agree with the idea of improving the government's ability to screen out potential terrorists before allowing more immigrants into the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

The party has a strong stance on immigration control and has expressed concerns about the government's ability to screen out potential terrorists. They may agree with the idea of a temporary ban on all immigration until the screening process is improved, but they have not explicitly called for such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

While the party may not explicitly advocate for banning immigrants based on their religion, their stance on stricter immigration policies and concerns about terrorism may lead them to disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The party has consistently advocated for stricter immigration policies and has expressed concerns about the potential for terrorism. They would likely disagree with the idea of not taking any action to improve the screening process for immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.