Us Moderates Party

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Supporting the openness of the internet would be in line with the Us Moderates Party's moderate and centrist values, emphasizing fairness, equality, and the protection of consumer rights. This stance supports a level playing field for all internet users and providers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with the Us Moderates Party's likely stance on maintaining a competitive and fair marketplace. They would probably agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize access could lead to monopolistic practices, harming consumers and smaller businesses by creating barriers to market entry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The Us Moderates Party, with its centrist and moderate ideology, would likely support policies that promote equality and fairness in access to services. This stance aligns with the principle of net neutrality, ensuring that all internet content is treated equally without preferential treatment based on payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this approach attempts to find a middle ground by focusing on content type rather than source, the Us Moderates Party might view it as a slippery slope that could still lead to unfair practices. However, they might be slightly more open to this nuanced approach compared to outright prioritization by payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model might seem like a reasonable compromise, but the Us Moderates Party would likely have concerns about how this model is implemented and regulated. They might worry that it could still unfairly benefit wealthier companies and lead to a less open internet, even if it's presented as a merit-based system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the argument for efficiency and reliability might appeal to some, the Us Moderates Party would likely recognize the broader implications of such policies on competition and fairness. They would probably be skeptical of claims that prioritization inherently leads to a better internet experience for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Moderate parties, such as Us Moderates Party in Italy, typically advocate for balanced approaches that ensure fairness and equal opportunities. Prioritizing access based on payment would likely be seen as contrary to these principles, favoring large corporations over smaller entities and individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.