Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry. Critics argue that such a policy might inadvertently promote discrimination by broadly categorizing individuals based on their nation of origin rather than specific, credible threat intelligence. It may strain diplomatic relations with the affected countries and potentially harm the perception of the nation enacting the ban, being seen as hostile or prejudiced towards certain international communities. Additionally, genuine refugees fleeing terrorism or persecution in their home countries might be unjustly denied safe haven.
23% Yes |
77% No |
20% Yes |
53% No |
2% Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process |
15% No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional |
1% Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease |
8% No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries |
See how support for each position on “Muslim Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 422k Italy voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Muslim Immigrant Ban” has changed over time for 422k Italy voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Italy users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@95CYYCZ2yrs2Y
@94MGBLZ2yrs2Y
No, vietare gli immigrati in base alla loro religione è incostituzionale e soprattutto discriminatorio
@94D5BTK2yrs2Y
il governo dovrebbe muoversi a schermare i terroristi
@9274V5W2yrs2Y
No, but we should control and control immigrants from high risk countries
@8RGQLTJ3yrs3Y
No, but we should run intensive background checks to make sure no terrorist linkage is involved
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Muslim Immigrant Ban” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to Italy voters.