Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 14.4k Anti-Immigration voters.
66% Yes |
34% No |
52% Yes |
27% No |
5% Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment |
8% No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
4% Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development |
|
2% Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record |
|
1% Yes, and it should be at least two years of service |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 14.4k Anti-Immigration voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 14.4k Anti-Immigration voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Anti-Immigration voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9TNFCQY2mos2MO
They should be required to spend a year training to develop socially valuable skills (such as basic emergency procedures, first responder training, personal finances management, advanced civics classes...) Following completion of a set number of trainings, they could be encouraged but not required to provide one year of military or civil service.
@9K64XQM9mos9MO
No, but if it has to be mandatory, it must be for both genders and the same in the eventuality of force mobilisation.
@92CDR4T3yrs3Y
Yes, but they should be signed in as reserve
@9BFBLTH2yrs2Y
Yes but for basic training and then 6 months of service and 2 years in the reserve forces.
@9BF9H6W2yrs2Y
Italy should have smaller but highly sofisticaded army
@973GW8B2yrs2Y
Increase awareness-raising and make military service a more attractive option voluntarily
@8W8P6333yrs3Y
yes, it is too risky that only a small group of people and often far-right people know how to use weapons
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Mandatory Military Service” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.