Single-payer healthcare is a system where every citizen pays the government to provide core healthcare services for all residents. Under this system the government may provide the care themselves or pay a private healthcare provider to do so. In a single-payer system all residents receive healthcare regardless of age, income or health status. Countries with single-payer healthcare systems include the U.K., Canada, Taiwan, Israel, France, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 806 Eco-Socialism voters.
64% Yes |
36% No |
34% Yes |
31% No |
13% Yes, this system guarantees healthcare for everyone |
3% No, this system is too expensive |
12% Yes, private companies should not be able to profit off of healthcare |
2% No, the government should not be involved in healthcare |
5% Yes, but allow people to use private insurance |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 806 Eco-Socialism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 806 Eco-Socialism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Eco-Socialism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@B2D3RW31mo1MO
No. I favor a hybrid healthcare model, merging key features from both the Swiss and Canadian systems.
@9MSNGWT9mos9MO
Yes, but not a single provider. I believe people working in the healthcare field know better than politicians on how to provide healthcare. Key performance metrics need to be aligned with profit margins.
@9LZ3NDS10mos10MO
Yes, but partial: part of the cost should be given to the individual depending on the type of healthcare, as well as characteristics such as obesity rate, status as smoker, cause of injury, income, etc...
@94VPCVL2yrs2Y
@94MGBLZ2yrs2Y
lo supporto se qualsiasi persona può usufruirne ad un costo limitato e senza tempi di attesta lunghissimi
Join in on the most popular conversations.