In 2022 lawmakers in the U.S. state of California passed legislation which empowered the state medical board to discipline doctors in the state who “disseminate misinformation or disinformation” that contradicts the “contemporary scientific consensus” or is “contrary to the standard of care.” Proponents of the law argue that doctors should be punished for spreading misinformation and that there is clear consensus on certain issues such as that apples contain sugar, measles is caused by a virus, and Down syndrome is caused by a chromosomal abnormality. Opponents argue that the law limits freedom of speech and scientific “consensus” often changes within mere months.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Ideology
Province
Community
Response rates from 886 Umbria voters.
61% Yes |
39% No |
52% Yes |
23% No |
5% Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive |
8% No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient |
3% Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license |
7% No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus |
2% No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 886 Umbria voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 886 Umbria voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Umbria voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MSNGWT6mos6MO
No, the state of medical science isn't developed far enough to restrict treatment methods to consensus. Consensus has been proven to be wrong even if it's mostly right. Healthcare should go far more in the direction of fundamentals in preventative care. That starts in getting children to learn good sleep habits, gain a good relationship to food, gain enjoyment out of movement and gain the skills of deep and meaningful relationships.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
