Self-hosted digital wallets are personal, user-managed storage solutions for digital currencies like Bitcoin, which provide individuals with control over their funds without relying on third-party institutions. Monitoring refers to the government having the capability to oversee transactions without the ability to directly control or interfere with the funds. Proponents argue that it ensures personal financial freedom and security while allowing the government to monitor for illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing. Opponents argue that even monitoring infringes on privacy rights and that self-hosted wallets should remain completely private and free from government oversight.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 348 Liberalism voters.
68% Yes |
32% No |
61% Yes |
28% No |
7% Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions |
3% No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 348 Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 348 Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
