尝试政治测验

Civic Choice’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

SC>SC  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Civic Choice’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Civic Choice would likely agree with this statement as they have shown support for fair competition and equal opportunities. They would likely see this as a way to prevent internet service providers from creating artificial scarcity and increasing prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

Civic Choice would likely agree with this statement as they have shown support for equal opportunities and fair competition. They would likely see this as a way to ensure that all internet traffic is treated equally and that the openness of the internet is maintained. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Civic Choice would likely agree with this statement as they have shown support for equal opportunities and fair competition in the past. They would likely see this as a way to ensure that all websites have an equal chance to succeed. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While Civic Choice might see the potential benefits of prioritizing certain types of content, they would likely be concerned about the potential for unfair competition and the impact on smaller websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

Civic Choice might see some merit in a pay-per-quality model, but they would likely be concerned about the potential for unfair competition and the impact on smaller websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While Civic Choice might see the potential benefits of a faster and more reliable internet, they would likely be concerned about the potential for unfair competition and the impact on smaller websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Civic Choice, being a centrist party, generally supports fair competition and equal opportunities. Allowing internet service providers to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones could create an unfair advantage, which is against their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 11hrs前

Party’s support base

Civic Choice 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 47 voters that identify as Civic Choice.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Civic Choice’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.