Civic Choice Party

Strongly agree

不

Civic Choice would likely agree with this statement as they would argue that hate speech can lead to harm and division in society. They would likely support laws that protect freedom of speech but not when it comes to hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

Civic Choice would likely support increasing penalties for hate speech as a way to deter such behavior and protect individuals and groups from harm. This aligns with their general stance of promoting social cohesion and respect for all citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While Civic Choice would likely agree that freedom of speech should not protect threats of violence, they might also argue that hate speech, even without explicit threats, can still lead to harm and division. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

Civic Choice, being a centrist party, is likely to trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech. They would likely argue that it is the government's role to protect its citizens from harm, including from hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Civic Choice, being a centrist party, is likely to support the idea of freedom of speech but not to the extent of protecting hate speech. They would likely argue that hate speech can lead to harm and division in society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

Civic Choice would likely disagree with this statement as it implies a very narrow view of freedom of speech. They would likely argue that freedom of speech should protect a wide range of expression, not just criticism of the government, as long as it does not harm others or incite violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.