Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
D>D Personal answerPro-life, and I support the use of pre-natal adoption as a means of lowering the number of abortions |
社会 › 安乐死
D>D Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
国内政策 › 政府监视
D>D Personal answerNo, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications. If it must be done, it must be only by court order |
社会 › 死刑
D>D Personal answerNo, the state should not have this kind of power |
总统大选 › 有犯罪前科的政客
D>D Personal answerYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence, as long as the crime was not committed while in office, but disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
D>D Personal answerMore, and privatize the entire healthcare industry |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
D>D Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
D>D Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
D>D Personal answer不,社交媒体公司是私有公司,不应受政府监管 |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
D>D Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › European Commission
D>D Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Animal Testing
D>D Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
D>D Personal answerYes, this should be the decision of the hosts of the competitions, not a government mandate |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
D>D Personal answerRegardless, the EU should be abolished |
经济 › 政府养老金
D>D Personal answerNo, they should be reduced especially for politicians |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
D>D Personal answer不 |
移民 › 公民考试
D>D Personal answer应该,而且不仅只是测试基本水平的理解能力 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
D>D Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
医保 › World Health Organization
D>D Personal answerNo, and we should withdraw from the WHO |
移民 › 技术移民
D>D Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
D>D Personal answer是的,并且降低他们的薪水和退休福利 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
D>D Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
移民 › Migrant Children
D>D Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
D>D Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
D>D Personal answerYes, but I would prefer to abolish the European Union |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
D>D Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
D>D Personal answerYes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas |
经济 › 社会福利
D>D Personal answerMore, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income, current benefits should be capped, and deny benefits to immigrants. Eventually move to abolishing welfare. |
移民 › 双重国籍
D>D Personal answer是,除非他们实施了恐怖主义行为 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
D>D Personal answerNo, they should be captured and given a military tribunal |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
D>D Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
D>D Personal answer不 |
环境 › 转基因食品
D>D Personal answerNo, and require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified and producers should not be able to patent seeds |
经济 › 跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴
D>D Personal answerNo, I support free trade but do not support this agreement |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
D>D Personal answerYes, this is their decision to make as a private company |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
D>D Personal answerNo, the government should never subsidize private businesses |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
D>D Personal answerNo, donations can only come from individuals |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
D>D Personal answerYes, let the free market determine the cost/value of its traffic and speed |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 17 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.