Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 安乐死
E>E Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
经济 › 同工同酬
E>E Personal answerYes, assuming that education, experience, and tenure are comparable. |
医保 › 精神健康
E>E Personal answer应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
E>E Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
社会 › 工作场所性别多元化
E>E Personal answer不应该,董事会成员应该是最有资格的人,不论性别 |
社会 › Hate Speech
E>E Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
科学 › 核能
E>E Personal answerYes, as long as it is used safely and in reasonable quantities. |
社会 › Gender Transition
E>E Personal answerYes, as long as treatment is not subsidized by the government |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
E>E Personal answer应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。 |
经济 › 税
E>E Personal answerNo, lower the income tax rate and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations |
交通运输 › 公共交通
E>E Personal answer不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化 |
经济 › 国内工作
E>E Personal answer不,政府不应该干涉自由市场 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
E>E Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
E>E Personal answer应该,只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试 |
罪行 › 运输毒品罪处以的刑罚
E>E Personal answerNo, unless he/she has also committed violent crimes |
外交政策 › 外国选举
E>E Personal answerNo, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
E>E Personal answerYes, though solely for defensive and humanitarian purposes |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
E>E Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
E>E Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
E>E Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
E>E Personal answerNeither, reform military spending to be more efficient |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
E>E Personal answerNo, not until further financial transparency has been established and publicized by the regime |
医保 › 大麻
E>E Personal answer是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
E>E Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
E>E Personal answer是的,但必须由一名女性工作人员私下确认她们的身份 |
环境 › Animal Testing
E>E Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
经济 › 政府支出
E>E Personal answer是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构 |
经济 › 政府养老金
E>E Personal answer在我们削减国债之前,不应该 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
E>E Personal answerYes, but only as a form of tax return |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
E>E Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
医保 › World Health Organization
E>E Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
移民 › 公民考试
E>E Personal answerYes, but do not deport them if they fail, they can still remain legal residents until they pass the Civics test. And we should have mandatory civic classrooms in all public schools. |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
E>E Personal answer不,太多富有的公民正在滥用海外银行法律的漏洞逃税 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
E>E Personal answerYes, but allow people to use private insurance |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
E>E Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
E>E Personal answer应该,任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
E>E Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
E>E Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
E>E Personal answerWe should promote and highlight democracy on Hong Kong and encourage China to take notice |
移民 › 技术移民
E>E Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
医保 › 安全港
E>E Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
E>E Personal answer是的,但他们必须每天进行社区服务 |
外交政策 › 外国援助
E>E Personal answer减少对外援助支出,直到显著减少我国的预算赤字 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
E>E Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
罪行 › Private Prisons
E>E Personal answerYes, but eliminate contractual occupancy quotas |
经济 › 社会福利
E>E Personal answer增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入 |
经济 › 关税
E>E Personal answer不,这会伤害我们依靠进口廉价资源生产产品的制造业业务 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
E>E Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
E>E Personal answer不 |
移民 › 双重国籍
E>E Personal answer是,但是他们不得申请超过两个国籍 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
E>E Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
环境 › 水力压裂法
E>E Personal answer不,需要更多的研究才能衡量水力压裂法的长期影响 |
经济 › 工会
E>E Personal answer破坏,我支持一些私人工会但是强烈反对公共工会 |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
E>E Personal answerNo, classify cryptocurrencies as unregulated commodities |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
E>E Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
E>E Personal answer应该,要对从政府那收到钱的所有人进行检查,包括雇员和政治家 |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
E>E Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation and NOT if they were convicted of murder or violent crime |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
E>E Personal answerNo, but encourage advertising from both sides, rather than censoring conservative media |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
E>E Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
经济 › State Ownership
E>E Personal answerNo, the government should never own shares of private companies |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
E>E Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
E>E Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
E>E Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
E>E Personal answerYes, but only if it’s truly decentralized and cannot be manipulated by any person, group, or government agency |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.