Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 安乐死
8>8 Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
医保 › COVID Mask Mandate
8>8 Personal answerNo, the government should recommend it but not require it |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 国内工作
8>8 Personal answerI am not sure if this is the appropriate role for the president. |
医保 › 精神健康
8>8 Personal answerNot enough knowledge to make an informed vote |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
8>8 Personal answerInclined towards yes, but this would be a huge change -- instead alternatively should be cosidred |
交通运输 › 公共交通
8>8 Personal answerNot enough knowledge to make an informed vote |
外交政策 › 外国选举
8>8 Personal answerThis seems to do more harm than good. |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
8>8 Personal answerListen to military leaders' input on this. Prefer no troops there, but not in an ideal world. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answerI am not informed enough yet on this |
外交政策 › 军费支出
8>8 Personal answerNot enough knowledge to make an informed vote |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 政府支出
8>8 Personal answerChanges are needed but this is a very complicated question |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answerNot enough knowledge to make an informed vote. Probably should be decided at state/local levels. |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
8>8 Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
8>8 Personal answerYes, but in the future when it is both sustainable and more necessary. It is inevitable but not as of yet. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as offshore income is reported. And willing to reconsider if this is gamed extensively. |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
8>8 Personal answerI do not know enough about this to place a vote or give an opinion. |
经济 › 农场补贴
8>8 Personal answerAlmost certainly no, but willing to reconsider for food security purposes (but suspect no still) |
国内政策 › 任期限制
8>8 Personal answerI don't have an opinion on this yet. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answerProbably no, but open to hearing arguments. |
医保 › 安全港
8>8 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
8>8 Personal answerIt depends on what the criminal did and how much time they have left |
外交政策 › 外国援助
8>8 Personal answerThis is a complicated topic; for example, I read that some foreign aid distorts local industry and development. Much more thought is needed. |
经济 › 关税
8>8 Personal answerIf so it would need to be for security reasons, and a *lot* of careful thought would need to be put into potential unintended consequences. For example, such action may hurt businesses that rely on importing cheap resources to make their products |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answerRegardless, funding should be given based on how well prisons rehabilitate convicts. |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only if the come from a Friendly Western Power. Such as the United States or Britain. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerNot enough knowledge to make an informed vote |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
经济 › 工会
8>8 Personal answerA little bit of both. People abuse every system and I'm not exactly sure how these work help. |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answerThis is an important topic but it is unclear if this should be solved by law. The appropriate application of law is probably via another channel, namely monopoly approaches. |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerYes, but I would prefer lowering corporate taxes to benefit all local companies |
经济 › State Ownership
8>8 Personal answerYes, but divest over time after 'repayment' is obtained. |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
8>8 Personal answerI do not know enough to make an educated choice. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
8>8 Personal answerI'm not informed enough to form a full opinion |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.