Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 安乐死
A>A Personal answer是,但必须经过心理测试,确定他们完全理解这种选择的后果才可以 |
科学 › 核能
A>A Personal answerYes, as long as it is carefully watched and used safely. |
医保 › 精神健康
A>A Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
A>A Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
A>A Personal answerNo, we should gradually pull out of the country rather than abruptly leave. |
环境 › Animal Testing
A>A Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
A>A Personal answerYes, but only if their hormone levels are equivalent to those in the gender category in which they compete |
移民 › 公民考试
A>A Personal answerYes, but the test should be very easy and only made to make sure the immigrant would not be ignorant to how America operates. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
A>A Personal answer不,根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的 |
医保 › World Health Organization
A>A Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
A>A Personal answer是的,任何缴纳税费的人都应该有投票的权利 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
A>A Personal answerNo, this system limits how efficient healthcare can be. |
外交政策 › 外国援助
A>A Personal answerI am satisfied with the current amount, but only countries that do not harbor or promote any terrorism, or human rights violations should be aided. |
医保 › 安全港
A>A Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
A>A Personal answerYes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment |
移民 › 双重国籍
A>A Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
A>A Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
A>A Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
A>A Personal answerYes, as long as the tax revenue will eventually exceed the tax incentives |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.