Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
环境 › 环境规制
9>9 Personal answerAttualmente no, quando l'inflazione tornerà ad essere regolare e i prezzi si abbasseranno potrebbe anche essere una soluzione valida |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answerIpotesi interessante ma occorre pensarci bene |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
9>9 Personal answerSpero di sì, ma trovo molto difficile che questo avvenga |
外交政策 › European Commission
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerSolo per farmaci |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answerParzialmente, se non rispettano i principi etici fondamentali di questa unione |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer不,但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
9>9 Personal answer应该,任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是只有在此国家生活10年后 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
9>9 Personal answerCreare un organizzazione europea, ma mantenere le intelligence nazionali |
外交政策 › 外国援助
9>9 Personal answerAumentare ai paesi che non violino principi umani, specialmente aumentare gli aiuti all'Ucraina |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
9>9 Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerNo, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
经济 › State Ownership
9>9 Personal answerNo, this impedes technological progress due to competition being stifled |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 14 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.