Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 死刑
9>9 Personal answerSi, per i crimini orribili e con probe inconfutabili e soltanto dopo aver passato un periodo di prova da psicologi/psichiatri che confermano l’instabilità mentale |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
9>9 Personal answerNo, il servizio dovrebbe essere una scelta non un obbligo a patto che non ci sia una guerra |
医保 › 大麻
9>9 Personal answerSi, soltanto se lo stato prende controllo della produzione e il commercio di essa |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answerSi, a seconda della categoria di test che si andrà a fare i ricercatori dovranno decidere/dichiarare se e perché optare ad un animale. |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
9>9 Personal answerNo, bisognerebbe aumentare le restrizioni per le droghe pesanti e gestire meglio le possibilità delle droghe leggere come la marijuana |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answerSi e anche i cittadini italiani dovrebbero, |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
9>9 Personal answerYes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
教育 › Student Exchange Programs
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
环境 › 转基因食品
9>9 Personal answerSi, se hanno come obbiettivo la riproduzione di cibi di qualità e con giusti macro |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answerSi, ma dovrebbero diminuire la pena |
科学 › 宇宙的探索
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Housing › High density residential buildings
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.