Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 同工同酬
H>H Personal answerNo, there are too many other variables such as education, experience, tenure, and negotiation skills that determine a fair salary, and the government should never determine what a private business should pay employees, except for minimum wage |
社会 › 堕胎
H>H Personal answerPro-life, but allow in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or child. These quotes from Mother Teresa sum up my feelings about it: "Please don't kill the child. I want the child. Please give me the child. I am willing to accept any child who would be aborted, and to give that child to a married couple who will love the child, and be loved by the child." "Any country that accepts abortion, is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants." "It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish." "The so-called right to abortion [...] has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters" And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity. The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." "But I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child - a direct killing of the innocent child - murder by the mother herself. And if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion? As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts. Jesus gave even his life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love - that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts." |
医保 › COVID Mask Mandate
H>H Personal answer不 |
社会 › 同性恋婚姻
H>H Personal answerNon, permettons les unions civiles mais ne parlons pas de mariage |
社会 › LGBT收养权
H>H Personal answerNo, and sem-sex (by birth) couples should not be able to adopt children, and neither should anyone else who is not a born-man and a born-woman who are married. (No single people, either) |
社会 › 死刑
H>H Personal answerYes, but only with euthanasia that kills instantly. |
经济 › 最低工资
H>H Personal answerYes, make it a living wage and adjust it according to inflation regularly enough to keep it a living wage. Perhaps enough to make $24k a year when working full time. I've heard of many people happily living on $7k per year despite having much more (even being rich). However, this does require some time to aquire skills for DIY. So $24k may be more reasonable for people without those skills. |
社会 › Hate Speech
H>H Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, and people say stupid things and shouldn't have the government get involved for it. Encouraging violence should be regulated, but not expressing hate. |
医保 › Stay At Home Order
H>H Personal answerNo, but people who know they have coronavirus should be required to stay at home, be given extra assistance if needed, and be charged for negligent manslaughter or something similar if they disobey and it results in someone's death. |
科学 › 核能
H>H Personal answerYes, measures have been taken so it is now one of the safest sources of energy. |
社会 › Gender Transition
H>H Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions. And ban all gender transitioning treatments. |
总统大选 › 最低投票年龄
H>H Personal answerNo. I believe that the writers of the Constitution were divinely inspired (I'm a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints). I personally believe (not a church opinion or anything. My own) that the reason they said only land-owning men should vote was to prevent the uneducated from making bad voting decisions. While I believe that women and non-property owners should be allowed to vote, I think it is wise to find a way to preserve the original intent. So perhaps voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote. This should NOT include calling certain OPINIONS right or wrong. |
经济 › 税
H>H Personal answerReform to a flat tax, or a flat tax for income after poverty level, and raise poverty level to the amount of money needed for a reasonable standard of living for someone with average financial literacy. Teach financial literacy in school. The lowest income I can consistently find people online living comfortably with is $7k, with some DIY skills. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
H>H Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
外交政策 › 外国选举
H>H Personal answerYes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
H>H Personal answerLet's see what happens in the other countries and then experiment with it if it is worth it. It is worth it if it increases GDP and/or significantly improves mental health and family ties. |
社会 › 女性在战斗中
H>H Personal answerYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory, but they should still have to meet the same requirements, and should not be drafted into combat roles. They should also be offered free birth control to prevent problems from rape by enemies. |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
H>H Personal answerYes, if they're willing to follow all its rules |
外交政策 › 阿富汗
H>H Personal answerYes, the war has been going on for so long that it sounds stupid now. We're not getting anywhere. |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
H>H Personal answerNo, then they'll get rid of mentions of religion. They shouldn't be allowed to determine what is fake or real news. Plus it would have prevented the Ranch Dressing Poptarts prank. |
外交政策 › 军费支出
H>H Personal answerIncrease, and better prioritize mental health. Often, military members' psychiatrists are told not to diagnose them with conditions they have, because then the government would be required to pay to help them with the disorder, and the budget isn't big enough for that. |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
H>H Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
H>H Personal answerYes, but not for cosmetics |
社会 › 蒙面罩袍
H>H Personal answerYes, it is a religious right. Plus, if they are being that clear that they are Muslim, they clearly aren't going to be a terrorist. Everyone will be watching them with that suspicion, so they wouldn't be able to get away with it. |
经济 › 政府支出
H>H Personal answerYes. I fancy the idea of the government hiring professionals to evaluate spending regularly to require government funds be used as efficiently as possible/practical. Eliminate non-vital costs we cannot yet afford, even if they could be part of an ideal world. We must work our way up to a better world wisely, and that means getting out of debt as much as possible. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
H>H Personal answerNo, athletes should compete based on the biological sex that is listed on their birth certificate |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
H>H Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Israel Boycott
H>H Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
经济 › 全民基本收入
H>H Personal answerNo, this will encourage people not to work, harm economic growth, give the government more power, increase national debt, and let the communists finish taking over (especially the politicians) |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
H>H Personal answerNo, we should not decriminalize drugs, except under supervision of a medical professional, and we should I clude mental health education in schools to teach alternatives to calming yourself with drugs like marijuana. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
H>H Personal answer不 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
H>H Personal answerYes, but companies should not. |
医保 › World Health Organization
H>H Personal answer不 |
移民 › 公民考试
H>H Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
医保 › 单一支付者医保
H>H Personal answerYes, but people should be allowed to opt out. |
国内政策 › 任期限制
H>H Personal answerWhatever the Constitution says. It is an inspired document for our government. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
H>H Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
H>H Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Hong Kong Fugitive Extradition
H>H Personal answerYes, but only for breaking laws that hurt people. |
经济 › 公司税
H>H Personal answerFlat tax it and continue to offer tax incentives for things that help the economy (in ethical ways), provided that they ultimately make us more money |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
H>H Personal answerNo, this violates the Amendment about doing trial twice.They should keep the sentence they got. But I approve of alternatives such as house arrest, and I certainly approve of training community service, given there are no opportunities for child abuse, stealing, etc. |
医保 › 安全港
H>H Personal answerNo, but they should not be put in a normal prison if they are willing to be rehabilitated. |
外交政策 › 外国援助
H>H Personal answerDecrease as much as needed to prioritize our own needs. We don't want to be so stretched thin that we are easy pickings. |
经济 › 社会福利
H>H Personal answerMore. We should raise the minimum wage to a beginner's living wage and only provide welfare to those who are incapable of working and for up to 6 months in between jobs. People with repairable conditions should be actively getting treatment and doing all that they can to support themselves. The government should find ways besides direct funding from the government to help people get treatment when they can't afford it. For example, they can ask people to donate to charity, do crowdsourcing and crowdfunding, and hire a paid or unpaid (volunteer) worker to find ways to make money for the person, such as through GoFundMe. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
H>H Personal answerYes, but prisons should be standardized and reformed according to available research on reforming prisoners. |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
H>H Personal answer是的 |
移民 › 双重国籍
H>H Personal answerYes, but only with allied countries. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
H>H Personal answerYes, but only if the evidence is virtually conclusive. |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
H>H Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
H>H Personal answerPolice should still exist for violent crimes and crimes where people are likely to be willing to be violent, such as robbery. We should take all the steps we reasonably can to prevent people from becoming criminals, as well as preventing crime. We could prevent people from becoming criminals by strengthening the family, such as by making some forms of “discipline” illegal that have been proven by many, many quality studies to have negative long-term effects. We can also include a mandatory “Family” class in public compulsory education to teach the essentials of parenting for the best outcomes in children and for happy and successful marriages, which are the basis and foundation of good parenting. The education and welfare systems can also be improved. We can prevent crime from people who chose to be criminals anyways in many ways. One way is to make sure all law-abiding (background checked), trained, safe citizens can have a gun and ammo. Other jobs should be created to take care of non-violent crimes previously addressed by cops. Cops should also get anti-discrimination training. Research shows that this is possible. Cops should be trained in this until they show that enough or all bias has been trained out before interacting with people in those minorities. Complaints against cops should also be taken very seriously, and investigated as a high priority, and local stations should not be afraid to fire officers for gross negligence. Those who commit negligence but not gross negligence should be retrained in the thing they violated and be put on probation. It would also be helpful for cops to build relationships with the community, or at least know who everyone is, so that they are virtually 0% likely to shoot someone they think is violent, who actually called 911 for help. In fact, police should be trained on how to safely apprehend violent criminals without killing them if possible, to further prevent unnecessary killing. |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
H>H Personal answerYes, and the government should require treatment, which will be paid for by the person paying what they can and the government finding a way to pay for the rest in ways other than directly funding it themselves. Terminate benefits where necessary. |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
H>H Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › 罪犯投票权
H>H Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation. Until then, they have forfeited their rights by breaking the law, and should not be allowed to vote if they are willing to hurt the country like that. |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
H>H Personal answerNo, but they should not tailor the political advertising to only show to people who agree with it. This will increase political polarization and lead to war. |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
H>H Personal answer是的 |
经济 › State Ownership
H>H Personal answerThat is fine, but the government should never be the majority stakeholder |
总统大选 › 候选人透明度
H>H Personal answer不,如果他们这样做了我会更加尊敬但是不应该要求他们做 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
H>H Personal answerYes, this is an act meant to signify aggression, which, in insignificant amount of cases, will escalate to worse things in the future, and it may cause fires. We should maintain at least some semblance of patriotism required. Because if they hate the country, then they are not loyal to it, and are likely to commit treason, which is rightfully punishable by death to prevent the overthrow and collapse of the government. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
H>H Personal answer不 |
经济 › Decentralized Finance
H>H Personal answer是的 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 18 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.