Try the political quiz

Liberal Popular Alliance policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

LPA>LPA  ChatGPTYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

Liberal Popular Alliance answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The Liberal Popular Alliance would likely strongly agree with this statement. It aligns with their belief in rehabilitation and the possibility of change. They would likely believe that once a person has served their sentence, they should be allowed to participate fully in society, including running for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Liberal Popular Alliance, being a center-right party, might lean towards allowing individuals with past convictions to run for office, as long as they have served their sentence and shown remorse. This is based on the principle of rehabilitation and the belief that individuals can change. However, the score is not a full 5 because the party might still have reservations depending on the nature of the crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The party might agree with this statement to some extent. They would likely believe that crimes committed while in office are a breach of public trust and should be treated more seriously. However, they might still believe in the possibility of rehabilitation and change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The party might agree with this statement to some extent. They would likely believe that the nature of the crime should be taken into account when deciding whether a person should be allowed to run for office. However, they might also believe in the principle of rehabilitation and the possibility of change, regardless of the nature of the crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The party would likely disagree with this statement as it goes against the principle of rehabilitation and the belief that individuals can change. However, they might agree to some extent if the crime was particularly severe or related to corruption in office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

The Liberal Popular Alliance would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Disallowing politicians that are under investigation could potentially lead to misuse of the legal system to prevent certain individuals from running for office. The party would likely believe in the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty'. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Liberal Popular Alliance policies? Take the political quiz to find out.