T>T ChatGPTNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices |
Together answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices
The 'Together' party would strongly agree with this statement, as they believe in equal access to the internet for all users. They would likely see the practice of speeding up access to popular websites as a way for internet service providers to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet
The 'Together' party would strongly agree with this statement, as they believe in equal access to the internet for all users. They would likely see the practice of treating all traffic equally as a way to maintain the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The 'Together' party would likely agree with this statement, as they believe in equal access to the internet for all users. They would likely see the practice of speeding up access to popular websites as a form of discrimination against less popular websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)
The 'Together' party would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe in equal access to the internet for all users. They would likely see the practice of giving priority by type and not source as a form of discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model
The 'Together' party would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe in equal access to the internet for all users. They would likely see a pay-per-quality model as a form of discrimination against users who cannot afford to pay for higher quality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users
While the 'Together' party would likely agree that making the internet faster and more reliable for users is a good thing, they would likely disagree with the method proposed in this statement. They would likely see this as a form of discrimination against less popular websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The 'Together' party in Italy is a progressive party that supports equal access to the internet for all users. They would likely disagree with the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones, as this could create a digital divide and limit access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Together policies? Take the political quiz to find out.