T>T ChatGPTYes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test |
Together answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test
The 'Together' party might agree with this statement as it extends the requirement of mental fitness to all politicians, not just those over 75. However, there is no specific historical stance or policy from the party that directly supports this view.
Agree
Yes
The 'Together' party might agree to some extent with this statement as it could ensure the mental fitness of politicians. However, there is no specific historical stance or policy from the party that directly supports this view. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, our government needs experienced leaders
The 'Together' party might slightly agree with this statement as they might value the experience that older politicians bring to the table. However, there is no specific historical stance or policy from the party that directly supports this view. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, I would prefer term limits instead
The 'Together' party might be neutral on this statement as it doesn't directly relate to the mental fitness of politicians. The party has not historically taken a strong stance on term limits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, this discriminates against older politicians
The 'Together' party might slightly disagree with this statement as they might see the value in ensuring the mental fitness of politicians. However, they might also be concerned about potential discrimination against older politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused
The 'Together' party might slightly disagree with this statement as they might see the value in ensuring the mental fitness of politicians. However, they might also be concerned about potential abuse of the testing process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The 'Together' party might disagree with this statement as they might see the value in ensuring the mental fitness of politicians. However, there is no specific historical stance or policy from the party that directly opposes this view. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office
The 'Together' party would likely disagree with this statement as it could be seen as discriminatory and limiting the pool of potential candidates. There is no specific historical stance or policy from the party that supports banning politicians over the age of retirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Together policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
