Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies

More Europe2024 European Parliamentary

Piu Europa

Overview Policies Discuss Ratings Themes Ideology

Piu Europa’s policies on criminal issues

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Italian [people] voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Crime  ›  Criminal Justice Use of AI

Should AI be used to make decisions in criminal justice systems?

PE>PE  Piu Europa voterbaseNo

Crime  ›  Drug Trafficking Penalties

Should drug traffickers receive the death penalty?

PE>PE  Piu Europa voterbaseNo, I do not believe in the death penalty

Crime  ›  Restorative Justice Programs

Should the government implement restorative justice programs as an alternative to incarceration?

PE>PE  Piu Europa voterbaseYes

Crime  ›  EU Legal System Integration

Should the EU move towards a more integrated legal system with uniform civil and criminal laws across all member states?

PE>PE  Piu Europa voterbaseYes

Crime  ›  Prison Overcrowding

Should non-violent prisoners be released from jail in order to reduce overcrowding?

PE>PE  Piu Europa voterbaseNo, but we should increase funding to offer education and skill building services for prisoners

Crime  ›  Demilitarize the Police

Should police departments be allowed to use military grade equipment?

PE>PE  Piu Europa voterbaseNo

Crime  ›  Private Prisons

Should the government hire private companies to run prisons?

  Party’s support baseNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit

Crime  ›  Criminal Voting Rights

Should convicted criminals have the right to vote?

PE>PE  Piu Europa voterbaseYes

Popular conversations

Join in on the post popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1wk1W

Gavin Newsom Defends Immigrants With $25 Million

Governor Newsom signed legislation allocating $50 million total to protect California's policies from Trump administration challenges and defend immigrants facing deportation, split evenly between the state's DOJ and legal defense groups.The funding comes as California anticipates renewed conflicts with Trump's administration, following over 100 legal actions against his first term policies on issues including climate, water, and immigration.Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas justified the funding by characterizing the Trump administration as "out-of-control" and threatening to Californians' constitutional rights.The signing occurred just after Newsom's Washington visit to secure federal disaster aid for January's devastating Los Angeles wildfires, which claimed more than two dozen lives.California recently enacted a separate $2.5 billion fire relief package, with expectations of federal reimbursement for disaster response costs.Republican lawmakers criticized the legal defense funding as a political distraction from wildfire recovery efforts, with State Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones calling it a "slush fund."Critics raised concerns about the possibility of funds being used to defend immigrants with serious felony convictions, though Newsom indicated this wasn't the intended purpose.The legislation emerged from a special session Newsom called shortly after Trump's election in November, demonstrating California's proactive stance against anticipated federal challenges.During Trump's first term, California initiated more than 120 lawsuits against his administration, spending approximately $42 million on legal battles.Annual legal expenses fighting federal policies during Trump's first term ranged from $2 million to nearly $13 million per year.

▲  1120 replies